|
Post by imdavidsgirl on Dec 29, 2012 13:16:38 GMT -5
It has it's dumb points and not great moments but its season 5 we get this in all season 5 episodes. I disagree. Shirts & Skins is a great episode IMO and has nothing bad about it, at least not for me, and I am very critical about season 5 as everybody knows LOL well I guess it is a question of taste. OMG yes that would have been hysterical!! So many good occasions those so-called writers let pass by! Oh i LOVE Shirts and Skins! I didnt say i didnt ! I love certain thigns about season 5. That whole epi is one of them. I think i love I See England too!
|
|
|
Post by imdavidsgirl on Dec 29, 2012 13:20:13 GMT -5
Oh and about the kiss - "aggressor" was the wrong word, Maddie wasn't aggressive in a violent way, I meant she did more than just initiate the kiss (which she should have, agree on that), she took David and kinda dipped him and laid him on the desk wheras he remained totally passive, which I don't like. But it's surely a question of personal taste. I think cause it was slow the way she stood and very sexily walked to him or closed the distance slowly between them and kissed him slowly thats why it was so slow to dip him and he was just enjoying it i think it wasnt a passionate pawing at each other scene and we know they had them .
|
|
|
Post by imdavidsgirl on Dec 29, 2012 13:23:14 GMT -5
And he hit below the belt too when he said she wasn't generous they were supposed to say those things to each other it didnt come out of the air.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2012 18:48:10 GMT -5
Sure, that's another topic. But it's why I find it so sad here. Why it makes it look to me she was so through with him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2012 18:51:40 GMT -5
And he hit below the belt too when he said she wasn't generous they were supposed to say those things to each other it didnt come out of the air. I think those two characterisations have a different quality. Besides, he was right - she said herself that probably she wasn't the most generous person in the world. Characterizing him as lewd, crude, loud and only interested in sex is pretty much calling him a superficial asshole IMO and then other scenes showed she still cared about him, so another inconsistency!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2012 18:54:00 GMT -5
She didn't think he was only that at all but she always described him that way..and he was that lol Of course he had many admirable traits but he was crude, lewd, irresponsible and you know she thought he thought sex was very important ...ffity aggity oop LOL Exactly, she knew he wasn't ONLY that. Then why saying it in such a detached way? That makes it look like she was so over him (and not in a good way). That just makes me sad.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2012 18:55:59 GMT -5
I disagree. Shirts & Skins is a great episode IMO and has nothing bad about it, at least not for me, and I am very critical about season 5 as everybody knows LOL well I guess it is a question of taste. Oh i LOVE Shirts and Skins! I didnt say i didnt ! I love certain thigns about season 5. That whole epi is one of them. I think i love I See England too! I know you do! I was just saying not EVERY season 5 episode has crap & inconsistencies to deal with. S&S has none of it, it's simply good.
|
|